2015 News

3/21/2015

2015 News

This is our first blog since we updated our web-site at the beginning of last year. The blog content of our old web-site was not able to be transferred over, so while our support for Scott has not changed course, we are starting a new Journey to Justice blog! In this blog entry, we want to update you on Scott's appeal and let you know about an important project being released this year.

2015 began with the State Attorney General’s office filing a Response Brief on January 26th. This brief was the second of three documents that need to be filed with the California Supreme Court before Scott’s appeal can be ruled on. The first brief was filed by Scott’s appellate attorneys in 2012. Both of these briefs are available for you to read under the APPEAL INFORMATION tab of our web-site.

There are at least two more significant events happening this year related to the case.

The first is that Scott’s attorneys are preparing the written Reply to the Response Brief. This is the third of the three briefs and should be filed before the end of the year. Once this third brief is filed, all three briefs are sent to the State Supreme Court. It will most likely be at least a three year wait before the court reviews the briefs and rules on Scott’s appeal.

The second thing we’re able to share with you is that our family was interviewed about the case for a documentary that is being produced. It is due to be released this year. We turned down various opportunities over the last ten years, but felt very strongly that this was the right time to an interview.

As we get more information about the release of this film or other updates, we will be sure to share them with you. Thank you for taking the time to read what we have to say!

The Peterson Family

191 Comments

Pi2015

3/21/2015 10:50:18 pm

I am very interested in the upcoming documentary about the case. So far most of what I have seen has been more along the lines of tabloid trash, and I've always hoped for a more serious and OBJECTIVE analysis of the evidence. Or lack of evidence, which seems to be the case here.

Since I never agreed with the jury verdict in this case, I am also hoping Scott will eventually prevail on appeal. Thanks for the info!

Josh link

5/21/2016 02:01:02 pm

Scott Peterson killed his wife and baby.

Janessa Lily link

6/18/2016 03:54:16 am

He most certainly did. Like the tragedy in the O.J. Simpson case, the murderer will be found. The husband did it.

James link

5/12/2017 07:31:28 pm

of course he killed them, everyone knows it. the thing is, if he admits it he will go to death, the only thing he he has to hold onto is the lie that
he did not do it. lieing may be the only thing that keeps him going.
He is a sick man, i hope he gets help while in the can.

Amanda

9/12/2017 02:20:13 pm

I don't believe he did. I believe he is innocent. And that because the media bashed him so bad that no one listened to the facts. They had absolutely no evidence

Marilyn Colley

9/24/2017 08:21:50 am

You all should publicly apologies to Laci's family and every abused woman out there for your dispicable support if Scott Peterson wife and child killer!

Jared Otero

10/4/2017 08:32:54 pm

Here are 10 reasons why we know Scott killed Laci, I could actually easily list 100. In fact, I actually made a list just to see how many I could come up with. I have 107 so far. I have been studying the case extensively. Just to give you and idea. #100 is: The Flirtinis he made for his step sister's babysitter.

1. He ordered porn channels within days of the disappearance
2. He sold Laci's car
3. He inquired about selling his house
4. He gave detective Brocchini a coaster to set his drink on the very night she was missing
5. He rented a car to go to the bay while the police were searching there.
6. The Amber tapes
7. The Amber tapes
8. The Amber tapes
9. The Amber tapes
10. The Amber tapes

I guess it is obvious how important I think those tapes were. In fact, those tapes are the reason Scott will never see the light of day. A new trial will not matter. As soon as the play the tapes it all becomes clear who is responsible for Laci's death.

Greg Rego

10/22/2017 10:38:38 pm

Yes he did for sure he should die slow

Ammie Wright

10/25/2017 12:38:39 pm

I disagree.

Alice Smith

12/30/2017 02:23:04 pm

He is where he has to be, i just want for all this to stop and finally he will pay for what he did, he is G U I L T Y !

justice

5/30/2016 04:38:09 pm

GUILTY! GUILTY! PIECE OF SHIT! HE KILLED THEM BOTH! BURN IN HELL!

Trinar

9/19/2017 11:12:25 am

Never closely followed the story. Just always felt that Scott wasn't the one who was guilty. Sorry he is going through this. Hope the truth comes out.

Marilyn Colley

9/24/2017 08:23:03 am

Death row needs to kill Scott Peterson now!

Robert Bruton

11/24/2017 09:06:12 pm

DING DING DING.....VERY FEW crimes have CCT Cameras detailing how and where they are committed. THAT IS WHY ((((CIRCUMSTANTIAL)))) evidence holds so much weight. Otherwise, juries would need to see a play by play (as we do before we make a call on FOOTBALL) !!! Get a grip...give it up....and stop grasping....deal with it....people are not perfect...and Scott sure isn't. YES there is DNA evidence, hair, and even the O.J. type scratch.....YES we have the neighbors who want to insert themselves into the case...happens in all case like this. Scott made sure he went on about his morning in a true-to-form alibi fashion, HENCE all the emails, web surfing, and tv watching.....after all, its easier to slip up on a lie if YOU DIDN'T do a normal routine...and say you DID....so HE SIMPLY DID !!!!!! Beyond a reasonable doubt simply means: We can't know for sure unless we have a camera recording the murder play by play.....THUS, there will always be a certain amount of DOUBT...reasonable doubt, (unless we see the murder happen firsthand or on camera).....this amount of doubt is permitted, as it is considered REASONABLE !

Sandy

12/21/2017 02:31:27 pm

It is a shame the family is wasting all there money for Scott Peterson. With all the existing events you would think they would give up and realize he did it and move on. We cannot argue the facts and there is a lot of facts. Scott was a spoiled boy who probably never told the truth. To the Peterson family - do not waste anymore of your money or time. Please quit denying the facts and have scott tell the truth before his execution.

justice marie

2/27/2018 02:59:04 am

I believe everyone involved knows he is innocent and there is alot more hidden in this case than what there trying to expose because its obvios there is alot more to this story and i alsio believe everyone involvred saying he is guilty and convincing the worlfd of there thoughts know he is guiltyt before being given gthe chance to be proven innocent all know he is innocent why else would these people keep everything so confusing in a death sentence thats evil within its self .

Sharon

3/25/2015 08:42:32 am

I have followed this case since first reading of Laci's disappearance. From the very beginning the Modesto PD muddied the evidence and provided far too much to the avarice judgmental press. I wrote a piece for a website devoted to the misinformation and incredible theories and assumptions being made about Scott's guilt. I still believe he did not kill Laci, did not get a fair trial and may never receive justice. I pray I am wrong.

Juan Costa

1/19/2017 01:00:05 pm

That dud is as guilty as guilty gets

Cindy

9/21/2017 01:21:27 pm

It's baffling that anyone besides the Peterson family (excluding Ann Bird, who got it right) could seriously entertain the notion that this homicidal narcissist might be innocent. Instead of doing the logical, human thing and getting a divorce, Scott sought the very opposite solution -- trading in Laci for a thinner, taller, blond version. Unfortunately for Scott, as all narcissists' mistakenly believe they are smarter than everyone else, they are not. Peterson's appeal will never be successful because hie will always remain guilty beyond all doubts. Period. He will either die by needle or by prison-yard scrap.

Chrisy

11/18/2017 10:07:53 pm

He is innocent

her step daddy did it

12/18/2017 01:46:48 am

Yep innocent. I read the original court preceding.
A. Laci' step daddy is the first one who reported her missing to the police
b. Her step daddy went fishing the sameday
c.her step dad was c i a naval intelligence
d.petersons had sold their restaurant and ironically a juror refused to vote that Peterson was guilty so he was removed from jury duty and the juror replacement was the deciding vote of supposed guilt..the juror was the son of the parents who had bought the petersons bar/restaurant!
Total conflict of interest.

Loralyn Curry

3/27/2015 08:27:11 am

I watched the Geraldo video and could not believe what I was hearing. Geraldo is worthless as far as being any type of serious journalist, in my opinion.

My prayers go out constantly for Scott and his family. I have believed, from the moment I (in Indiana) heard the national news report, asking for help in establishing Scott's alibi, and then announcing exactly where Scott said he was on Dec. 24th. I was so upset that I actually screamed at my TV. I could not believe the ignorance of the Modesto Police.

I am, all these years later, still shocked at the way this case went down. I pray for justice, not only for Scott, but for his wife and son as well.

Christy

11/18/2017 10:08:53 pm

Amen

gillian

4/10/2015 01:45:37 am

I am from Scotland and was living in America during this case. I never believed in his guilt with regards to laci. I feel the tabloids ruined his chance for a fair trial from the offset. Is there anyway of writing to Scott? Thanks Gillian St Andrews Scotland

Josh

5/5/2015 05:25:52 am

Still praying for Scott and that he actually gets a fighting chance at a FAIR and IMPARTIAL review of this brief.
I have been following this situation since day 1 and I am still so sickeningly disturbed by the lack of justice he has received.
Thank you for keeping us posted and please rest assured that you still have people standing behind your family praying for justice!

Greg Rego

10/22/2017 10:40:29 pm

U stupid fuck

Greg Rego

10/22/2017 10:41:07 pm

Guilty

Kaytlynn

5/11/2015 09:27:14 am

I am only 21 years old, the disappearance of Laci happened when I was only 9 years old, but I remember seeing her picture everywhere and I remember seeing news reports on the T.V about Scott Peterson's trial...

I recently saw the Lifetime tv movie (The Perfect Husband: Laci Peterson Story) and just became very interested in the case so I started doing research on this. I have watched Scott's interviews, listened to the recorded calls, read the trial quotes, etc. along with every informational tab provided by this web-site.

I am not convinced that Scott murdered his wife and unborn child, I will admit that where the body of Laci and Connor washed up at is coincidental to near where he was fishing, but that should NOT convict a man with no other physical evidence to show. I believe that he deserves a fair trial, one in which the media cannot twist the information around to make him look like a monster.

I will be keeping my eye out for the upcoming events and updates. Thank you for sharing this information!

joe raines

1/9/2016 07:26:53 pm

I have no doubt he arranged this. Who would murder this pregnant women out in the water and her body washes up in an area he was fishing? Motive in my book was the pregnancy, and the thought of being tied down and a father. He'll either rot in prison for the rest of his life, or be put to death?

Shelley Betts

6/2/2016 03:52:51 pm

I have to say I unfortunately think Scott did do it... Who else had motive and opportunity?

Josh Barnes

8/29/2017 12:24:37 am

You are 100% correct Joe. His family is so stupid and blind that they just don't want to accept the fact that Scott did this. There are numerous examples of this on this web site. Here is a good one of how ridiculous his family is. In the case facts, his family says that because he told Amber that he couldn't see her during Thanksgiving and Christmas and January that that is an example of Scott making himself unavailable. How stupid! If he really wanted to be unavailable why not just tell Amber he couldn't see her anymore? or maybe tell her the truth that he was married and he needed to end things with her? The reason he told her that is because he knew he wouldn't be able to make an excuse to his family that he couldn't be around on Thanksgiving and Christmas. He also knew that Lacy was going to give birth in January and he would have no free time. What Scott was doing is just putting Amber off for a while until he could get some free time.

JOE RAINES

9/12/2017 11:19:46 am

Scott thought he could get away with it. He was a con artist even making it seem to his new girl friend he was with volunteers searching for the wife he murdered along with the baby....

CHRISTINA

5/28/2015 09:56:06 am

When I first heard the news of laci missing, I got interested in the case, My first thought after hearing about Amber and the lies was yep he is guilty, however after the evidence was presented, there is still no real proof, I thought for sure the jury was going to find him NOT GUILTY, how could they not, anyhow Im sure we all have questions for scot, hope they find the real truth

Jesse

6/19/2015 11:48:58 am

The DA office should be ashamed of themselves for waiting and wasting three years to file a response! This shows that the prosecutors are backed up against the wall in the corner and grasping at staws. At this point, they will desperately do anything to delay/drag this out for the longest time possible, cuz those elected prosecutors don't want to be the ones to lose and admit their wrongdoings. Once the final part are filed and delivered to the supreme court, I hope it don't take additional three years wait time to finally get to this case. Scott needs to be released and free, ASAP!!! I believe that Scott's case are more than enough to have his conviction overturned and thrown out. Once he is a free man, his attorneys should assist him in filing a lawsuit against the state for wrongful conviction, wrongful imprisonment and many more various reasons in order to be paid millions of dollars from the state. Scott, his family and Laci's family will benefit greatly with the money plus it will help Scott to refresh his life and live safely in peace.

Mandy

3/8/2016 01:16:30 am

Oh yes, Scott deserves to get paid millions and 'refresh' his life. Poor, poor Scott who was so destroyed by his loss that I never saw him shed a tear or look anything other than bored during his trial. Poor guy. Nevermind that his precious son never got a chance at life, will never be a teenager, never get married & have children of his own...he never even got a chance to take a breath. & Laci never got to nurse her son or watch her child grow into a man...she never even got to hold him. Yeah, poor Scott. Let's give HIM a fresh start!

Katelyn

9/12/2017 09:53:45 pm

You were at his trial?

Cindy

9/21/2017 01:31:04 pm

Yes! you go girl! Ditto on it all.

Christy

11/18/2017 10:15:02 pm

A to the men. Amen baby!!! This man was done wrong.

JOE RAINES

11/22/2017 03:53:52 pm

The justice system can be slow, but be assure they got their man. Who else would want to murder this poor women or have the motive? He must have believed he would get away with it, but with forensics, and tools available to investigators it allows them to narrow their search as well as connect the dots. I can't imagine the horror this poor women felt being attacked by someone she loved and trusted. Somebody has to speak for her and her child, and the justice system will...

Paul

6/27/2015 09:57:20 am

Been following since the beginning on your old blog. I have always been convinced Scott should NOT have been found guilty! There simply wasn't the evidence to convict him and reasonable doubt was plentiful! I truly hope his appeal gets heard and they grant him a new trial. Furthermore if this does happen I hope the jury actually does the job they are supposed to do and rule on the evidence, or in this case lack of it! NOT on public prejudices!

Tina

7/22/2015 02:28:42 pm

I have always believed Scott was innocent. I have a great deal of faith in his getting the justice he deserves. I pray I am not wrong.

bobby bonds

1/3/2017 11:26:14 pm

He is exactly where he belongs to be—behind bars. “I loved Stacy,” he said. Than that must be why he had extramarital affairs with 3 women. Nothing like sticking a harpoon in the back of the wife you “love.” You deluded people need not worry. It takes 50 years to be executed by the state of California. They’ll bring him out in a box instead.

Jaroslaw

8/18/2018 04:41:29 pm

Bobby Bonds. if every man who had an affair killed his wife the population of the USA would decrease by at least 20% tomorrow. I have worked in more offices than I cars to mention and knew a few people in the motel business. Infidelity happens a lot more than people care to admit. A friend loaned me a college textbook - sociology I think. in the days before privacy and consent laws scientists studied blood types from hospital birth records and were amazed at how many husbands were NOT the father. So Scott may be a cad but that does not prove he is a murderer by any means.

Carole Lemons Griffin

8/2/2015 12:12:53 pm

I have followed this case since day one and I am still praying that Scott will eventually get a new trial. There is no way in hell that he killed Laci and his unborn child. Poor guy was railroaded all the way to San Quentin's death row.

Kim

10/7/2015 08:17:32 pm

Good luck to you~ I hope it all works out for the best and that justice prevails.

Michelle burchard trinidad

10/16/2015 06:08:54 pm

I've watched the Peterson trial from day one never believed he killed his wife and unborn son I hope he gets to prove he didn't and also hope I'm right about him and hope I'm not wrong best wishes and good luck to the Petersons

Linda C

10/17/2015 05:00:06 pm

I have been following this from day one and never thought Scott was guilty. I Pray for him and his family daily. It is so obvious that he did NOT get a FAIR TRIAL as our Constitution requires. One moment always sticks in my mind; a juror interviewed after the Verdict, was asked if she wanted to hear from Scott on the stand. She made a face like she hated Scott and said I heard enough from him on the tapes. That alone is reason for releasing Scott. The Law says that no Guilty Verdict can be made based on personal feelings toward the Defendant. Only on Evidence presented. I will continue to check back!! Thank you for this info. The entire Peterson family will remain in my Prayers. Tell Scott to Keep the Faith.

Rhonda Nankervis

10/24/2015 05:44:41 pm

Dear Scott, I just wanted to wish you a happy birthday!!!!!! I know it's not fair that you have to spend another birthday behind bars. Scott I pray for you everyday that you will get another trial and that you will be back in society where you belong. I hope you are doing okay justice will prevail and you will be a free man one day. I will keep you and your family in my prayers.

sending my love,
Rhonda

jeni espinosa

1/15/2016 10:34:27 pm

Wow another idiot!

bobby bonds

1/3/2017 11:28:45 pm

I never understood groupies of murderers. I never will.

joanne link

10/24/2015 07:51:27 pm

I want to say to Scott Peterson family and to him I think you are innocent since the first time I saw you on the news .I know you are innocent of all chargers hang in there Scott god see you are not guilty this is just a bump in the road I believe In you .god bless you Scott

jeni

1/15/2016 10:33:16 pm

You are not too bright Joann!

Nikki

9/28/2017 07:36:55 pm

Words that tear people down are made by those that are insecure and have low self-esteem. How about making some respectful replies/comments jeni.

The Orange Safety Cone Trilogy

11/29/2015 10:14:56 am

I too am interested in seeing a piece that fully presents an accurate, unbiased (both sides), and objective documentary that I suspect would probably be a good four or five hours in length. I'd eagerly watch it.

I notice that all comments must be preapproved before being posted and I can understand that to a degree considering some saucy language might be used that could cheapen the purpose of the website. I totally get it. That said, I could not help but notice each comment permitted is in support of Scott and opposing views must not be allowed? Yes, I'm assuming because one would surmise that there would be just one if they were permitted. It's only an observation and I suppose I can understand why this would be. You more than likely would want one, just one, blog or website all to yourself to combat the overwhelming number of sites that are "anti-Scott." I get it.

I look foward to any documentary you're willing to produce and publish one day.

Wendy O.

12/2/2015 11:27:08 am

I believed Scott was guilty the morning I heard his pregnant wife was missing. I still believe he's guilty! Sorry folks, Scott is where he belongs! Justice for LACI!

Jaroslaw

8/18/2018 04:48:03 pm

Wendy - you could not have read anything in this blog. Over 2 dozen witnesses saw Laci or a woman who looked like her later in the day. The police never followed up on any of this. There is so much more and misinformation disseminated by the police and the media. You don't have to take the family's word - info is out there now. These conflicts need to be addressed. you would want as much for yourself.

Pam

12/4/2015 09:20:34 am

Found guilty - Is guilty

Bubba

9/10/2017 12:54:57 pm

guilty, but not of murder, of being a adulterer? yes, murder? no. not directly anyway, and there is not any evidence he hired anyone.

Tony

12/9/2015 01:31:22 pm

Not sure if you did it or not. I think your a terrible person for cheating on your wife.....but I feel the state can not and should not be able to take your life with out 100% certainty you did this. That being said I am not convinced that there is evidence out there to say you did this. I believe you have not been treated fairly in this trial and if the state is going to deprive you of life and liberty it needs to be fair and complete. So I am not sure I am supporting you as much as I am supporting our rights to be treated fairly in a court.

5/1/2017 04:17:49 pm

I agree. Unless someone admits guilt or is caught in the act should the death sentence be used. If someone proclaims their innocence and is convicted on circumstantial evidence then the death penalty should be off the table!

Heather

7/4/2018 04:34:58 pm

That is exactly what I am saying. I cannot believe that a jury or the justice system could put a man away without proof. I know everyone feels some kind of way about it and they think this is what happened but they do not KNOW that he did. Seems to me like someone screwed up and now doesn't want to fess up and say, you know what , I might have been wrong. Again, I am not speaking on the guilt or innocence of Scott. The fact is, the burden of proof is on the state. They have not proved his guilt!

12/26/2015 07:09:12 pm

Give him the needle

kristi mcneill

1/13/2016 07:26:20 am

I hope Scott gets a appeal trial soon, and I hope he gets released.I have watched everything about this case and u know Scott is innocent. God bless you Scott and your family.

jeni

1/15/2016 05:47:40 am

All of these comments are from 16 really stupid people!

jeni

1/15/2016 10:26:30 pm

He's Guilty you idiots! Execute the bastard already! Get it together California!

jj whats

2/6/2016 09:09:51 am

you people are insane! i've never seen someone so guilty as this guy! he was cheating with amber and NO ONE else did this! fry him already and lets end this crap!

Manuel Losada

2/13/2016 04:35:36 pm

Scott should save his soul and admit his guilt.

bobby bonds

1/3/2017 11:30:39 pm

He can't. That would nuke his appeals.

angiie

2/17/2016 10:43:39 am

Has there been any more suspects? Any evidence that shows other DNA of another person. And what wud their motive be?

kristine

3/3/2016 01:51:46 pm

I support Scott. I am a married mother of four wonderful children. so I am not posting this because I have the some strange feelings towards scott. I read all the case notes on this page and I wrote to scott when the trial was going on and he wrote back to me thanking me for supporting him.
I could clearly see that just because you have an affair does not mean that you are a killer or that you killed your wife.
The police like to make up stuff and railroad people by what they think happened to her.
its clear that lacy was a victim. she went out on her walk and was taken by probably that men that stole the safe. Its just sounds like the time frame that those men were in the area is around the time she went missing.
my own family member was accused of a crime he did not do and police do lie.
God in the only one who really knows what happened and sometimes people suffer through no fault of their own.
God will help Scott prevail.
I pray that he will get the Justice he deserves. Freedom and his name cleared.

Ana

2/21/2018 01:47:45 pm

Amen!

Verum

3/24/2016 08:17:39 pm

I find intriguing that all comments on this site point towards Scott Peterson's innocence, a.k.a., San Quentin Condemned Prison V-72100. Peterson was innocent until the day he murdered his wife on their bed in their Modesto home, the city where I live. He is a stain on our city. Peterson had motive, opportunity and cause. The trial in 2004, and appeal evidence thereafter, offer overwhelming proof of his guilt; there are no other suspects as none exist. The Peterson family has shirked responsibility toward society and Laci's family by failing to admit that Scott Peterson is a murderer.

bobby bonds

1/3/2017 11:34:53 pm

I find it laughable. Groupies love him. The deluded support him. Laci's people must be sick when they hear groupies and the deluded proclaiming his innocence. He's exactly where he needs to be.

Ana

2/21/2018 01:56:32 pm

Were you there? There are no other suspects because the cops only went after Scott. They ignored witnesses that saw so many sightings of Lacey. The media brain washed us all. But the truth is he was framed. The media told the world exactly where scott was on christmas eve morning. The area was searched and nothing til way later. Please! It so obvious. She was dumped there later.

Brian Parent

3/31/2016 01:52:58 pm

I do NOT believe in the Death Penalty under any circumstances.

bobby bonds

1/3/2017 11:33:00 pm

Don't worry, it takes California 50 years to execute anyone. Serial killer Ng, responsible for the deaths of over a dozen, including a baby, has been on Death Row since 1985. He'll die of old age, not execution.

Christina

12/1/2017 11:19:39 pm

Why.?

Teresa

4/3/2016 05:53:28 am

I've been interested in this case for a few years now...and after reading the entire case history/appeal and so on....I do not believe for one minute that Scott killed laci and Connor. My prayers are with you Scott and your family we can only hope you eventually get the fair rial you were so wrongly and falsely deprived of in the beginning.

Ashley Tremaine

4/3/2016 09:58:50 pm

Are you kidding me??!! He's guilty as sin! Get real!!

Shelly

4/18/2016 09:58:31 pm

Scott, you should stop wasting my money keeping you alive. Tine to pay for what you did. At least have the decency to man up and wn your responsibility. You are a coward of the worst kind and are beyond redemption since sociopaths know nothing about morals. Die already!

A Voice of Sanity link

5/31/2016 07:46:32 pm

Before any of you claim that Scott Peterson had any involvement in the abduction and deaths of his wife and baby to be, go read the habeas petition (it's on this site). First, he must be retried because of extreme juror misconduct. No court can permit what happened in this case to pass without redress. It is a dagger in the heart of justice. This juror will almost certainly go to prison.

Second, read what the best expert on fetal development (Dr Jeanty) had to say. He is the expert used by state's witness Dr Gregory DeVore to make his calculations.

He has positively stated that Conner was alive on Jan 5th which means it is impossible that Scott was involved. As a result, a retrial is impossible.

If you disagree, come up with a scenario where the baby, and hence obviously the mother, are alive on or after Jan 5th. Until you can, Scott Peterson is an innocent man as I have said all along.

Until you do, make no claims of Scott's guilt. They are untrue.

Harry Johnson

9/27/2016 05:34:51 pm

This is ridiculous. Saying the fetus was alive on Jan.5 is just speculation. That is only an 11 day difference from Dec.25 which is when Scott killed his wife. There isn't a doctor on the planet that can determine the age of a fetus, especially one that was near full term, to an 11 day certainty.

haywood

9/20/2017 08:47:52 pm

He's not getting a new trial and if you think he is innocent you're the voice of stupiditty

Cindy

9/21/2017 01:32:49 pm

Juror misconduct? Pathetic. I hope that's not their only ace.

Christy

11/18/2017 10:18:27 pm

Exactly!!!!!!

Dannie

7/18/2016 07:20:02 pm

I remember this case but didn't pay much attention to it until now. I saw an article on Scott's life in prison in a magazine. I have been studying interviews, reading books, watching videos and I'm not convinced he did it. Did he play any part in it? Who knows. But I am leaning more to his side and find him very interesting. I wrote him a letter and I do hope he writes me back.

Liz

7/19/2016 05:18:15 pm

I remember watching this trial on t.v. and I read the books and I drove by the house as I have family in Modesto. I have my opinion in my heart as I did then but its not up to me to judge as someday who ever did this to Beautiful Laci and her son will have to answer. Be together in Peace Laci and Connor you are amongst Angels where no one will ever hurt you again. ❤

Susan

7/23/2016 07:48:38 pm

The disappearance of Laci Peterson kept me captivated from the beginning. I didn't have a firm opinion until months after Laci and Connor were recovered. I know both families have suffered, but I believe Scott did kill Laci and Connor for selfish reasons known only to him. I just couldn't get past his behavior during interviews, going back to the 'scene' and all of the gear he was carrying including his brother's ID. Just something off there. Having said this, I feel badly for his family going through this. They love their son as I do mine. However, my sympathy is with Laci's family and even after all these years, my heart aches for Sharon Rocha.

Ish

7/29/2016 06:18:59 pm

He did it !! Fry the son of a bitch !!!

Don

9/25/2016 10:11:28 am

There is a lot of "evidence" on this site mentioned in detail for the sake of Scott's defense, but none of it really proves anything. Certainly nothing to overturn Scott's conviction. Furthermore, when weighing the prosecution's evidence with that of the defense's evidence (including the details on this site), the prosecution's far outweigh the defense. In my opinion, there were just way too many "coincidences" to say Scott didn't do it. The boat and fishing in the same vicinity and time where Lacy was found. Before she was found, the prosecution was sure that is where she was dumped, and then the news came out just days later that her and her unborn childs bodies washed up on shore. Conincidence?? C'mon. They knew Scott did it and they knew where he did it, they just needed to find the bodies, which they did. The affair that Scott was having at the time (there's your motif) when all this happened. Another conicidence?? Please. Scott running for the Mexican border and changing his appearance once the evidence starting stacking up against him. Coincidence?? Hardly. Tell tale sign that he was guilty of something. All the interviews where he's "crying" when talking about Lacy. Totally faked without a single tear. Whether the prosecution had sufficient evidence to convict or not is irregardless. The man did it and he'll spend the rest of his life paying for it behind bars.

Bullzie

10/4/2016 09:27:05 am

Seriously people???? This guy is guilty as they come.

Jimu link

11/6/2016 03:36:26 pm

As I remember Scott died his hair and had a stack of cash when they arrested him what was that all about furnace in person?

Stephanie DeFelice

12/29/2016 04:22:37 pm

He's guilty! It's a sin that you are still trying to clear his name

Thomas

12/31/2016 03:46:27 pm

Scott..... ohhhh Scott... smh.... if it walks like a duck.....quacks like a duck... looks like a duck... well... then it probably is a duck.... I'm just saying....

Jonathan Breckenridge

1/30/2017 10:11:06 pm

Scott did the murder, everything the prosecutor said he did, he did. The way they described HOW he did it, step by step, they got it on the money. Everything says he did it and he is guilty. I understand that his parents dont want to face this. Do they want to have to say "Our son murdered his wife and unborn child." - No Parent would. So they have to do this web site , i would guess to stay sane.
I dont know if his mother is still alive, but assuming she is, I feel terribly for his parents. So many people be brought suffering too, his parents included. Yet he sits in prison, STILL NOT ADMITTING IT!.
I think A LOT of people would have a slight respect for him, if he admitted what he did. May God have mercy on his soul. I do hope he asks God for forgiveness for what he did. But he has to admit it to the world AND God to get the forgiveness! HE DID IT. We all Know It !! Thanks for reading.

Sally O.

3/15/2017 10:25:14 pm

It is so sad that a sick, psychopath like Scott Peterson was able to victimize this poor woman and his unborn baby. I feel so badly for her family and I could see where the apple didn't fall far from the tree. His parents were rude, ignorant and self-righteous.

Stacy

3/17/2017 01:15:22 am

I honestly remember this story when I was younger and was filled with an opinion based off the media. So wrong to have done. I have gone through and read all of your information and facts. I believe he deserves an appeal. Justice for Scott!

Sharon

4/8/2017 08:51:18 am

If the boat capsized that would explain Why Scott had to change his clothes. His clothes where wet when the boat capsized. Second Jackie was already speaking like laci was dead Scott's family already knew the truth that's why he didn't call them when she was missing. A good loving husband would look for his wife as soon as he walked through the door. Scott could of watch Martha Stewart and went on lacis computer. Scott didn't act like he cared his wife was missing. I don't relay on witnesses there judgement is cloudy , and can be paid. Anyone can say she was walking the dog or they saw her it's hearsay. scott didn't even look for laci and acted like her missing was an inconvenience . He didn't cry or acted like he cared. He even said laci wouldn't like that . In Sharon's book Scott wouldn't even look at her that's a sign of guilt. Scott said laci wouldn't like coats on a chair . Why is talking like she's already dead. Because he knew. I was This and though maybe but after reading Sharon's book . I see that everything on this site is a lie and Scott murdered her.

jerry fartwell

4/22/2017 10:00:07 pm

Scott just finds out that the bodies of his wife and child were found in the marina and what is his response to detectives? I'll have a double double with cheese, small fries and a vanilla shake. GUILTY!!!!!!

Judy Smirh

4/24/2017 11:22:15 am

Scott Peterson deserves to die for the death he made happen to his wife and baby. A film forthcoming? Ban it. Ban him to hell. Where he deserves to be.

Casey

4/28/2017 09:12:21 pm

First let me say that I have no vested interest in this case, never lived in northern California, and consider myself just a casual observer to this circus. Like others, I'm not certain of his guilt or innocence either, but tend to lean toward innocence only because of lack of hard evidence. The evidence is mostly circumstantial. I lived in Southern California during the OJ fiasco and this one. I guess what concerns me more than anything else is that the media went to extremes in both cases to draw their own conclusions without all of the facts to garner huge television and print audiences. No doubt, coverage on this case and similar ones is hugely profitable for media outlets. How could anyone possibly receive a fair trial under these circumstances? It wouldn't matter if the trial was in Modesto or Miami, your juror pool is potentially tainted by the extreme tabloid style media coverage that was endless. Suddenly, every person on the planet was an expert sleuth who felt qualified to judge a case they really knew nothing about. And having served as a juror myself on a couple of occasions, I know for a fact that people will do or say anything to either eliminate themselves from participation, OR to ensure that they are picked for participation. I find that incredibly disturbing too, because I learned first hand from that experience that if potential jurors are willing to lie under those circumstances, do you really want them to begin with? The attorneys that pick the jurors are just as bad. I normally wouldn't want tax dollars to be wasted for a retrial, but in this case, I'd say this one deserves a second trial because the media attention was overly sensational, the case lacked any substantial evidence that was more than circumstantial, and too many other possibilities were not fully explored - such as the criminal activity that was taking place across the street during this exact timeline. Blast me all you want, but you'll likely never convince me that adultery is a prime motivating factor for murder. The financial motives are poorly supported too.

Christy

11/18/2017 10:20:23 pm

Thank you. Couldn't have said it better.

5/1/2017 04:14:01 pm

Fact is there was nothing but circumstantial evidence and the jury couldn't possibly have convicted him beyond a reasonable doubt. If you ever get accused of something like this request a bench trial. Juries are our peers and use their own personal feelings. Scott didn't stand a chance after the media frenzy. Set him free.

Shawn

5/8/2017 12:40:28 pm

Guilty or not the prosecution never proved anything, this case was circumstantial. We are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty this wasn't the case here.

Ramoid

8/10/2017 03:52:35 pm

Ever since the first trial I had the utmost feeling of Oh my God, he didn't do it.

Christy

11/18/2017 10:21:48 pm

Yep. Me too.

mark

8/22/2017 10:05:01 pm

I do hope he gets another fair trial. At first I did think he may have done this from what the media was saying but now looking at the evidence again I think hes innocent and Everyone in this case deserves a fair trial I do believe the media can ruin your life I pray and hope if Scott didnt do this they bring whoever was involved to justice God Speed

Christy

11/18/2017 10:22:22 pm

Me too.

Ass

8/24/2017 08:23:45 pm

Stop being assholes! Guilty as sin! Just grows a beard and dyes his hair....yeah,he's innocent alright...lol

Kim

10/7/2017 05:20:28 pm

Dear commenter names ASS (a more appropriate name I can’t think of)-
If the media was hunting you down night and day in the wake of your wife’s disappearance, simply to gain ratings and fill the gullible minds of those obviously without a life like you and a few others that have commented, I guarantee you that you would disguise yourself as well. It sickens me to think that our society is made up of those that are so quick to accept the word of the police, the news, gossip and dribble without truly seeking the facts. I hope with every fiber of my being that Scott gets what he deserves, and that is a new FAIR trial. He didn’t have anything close to it and I honestly believe that if the police had humbled themselves just a bit and actually LOOKED for Laci following the leads they ignored, she and Conner may be alive today. It seems that’s what everyone, caught in their mob mentality to ‘fry Scott’, forgot. Shame on all of you. You made you judge, jury and executioner? Free Scott Peterson!!

CAROL link

8/26/2017 10:39:05 am

The only person who knows if Scott killed Laci, is Scott. As far as evidence goes, there is none. I would like to know why all the people seeing Laci walk her dog was not allowed in court. The shoes found at the park, the almost abduction of another pregnant lady that day, the screams in the park. The returning dog alone. The fact that if Scott didn't want a child, why would he run around with a woman who had a little baby? Certainly he would not have left Laci for her if he didn't want a child, i could go on and on, the man did not get a fair trial, in fact, this case was so flimsy it should have never went to trial. It is injustice. I feel so for Scott and his family. Affairs are never pretty and if Scott is innocent, i am sure he knows this convicted him. Whether he is guilty or not, i cannot say, no one can but GOD and Scott, so free him, no evidence.

Pepper Gardner

9/5/2017 06:55:41 am

You have to look past the cheating. Just because Scott was stupid and cheated on Lacy and then tried keep anyone from finding out about his girlfriend, does not make him a killer. I also think SCOTT PETERSON DESERVES A NEW TRIAL !!!!

For those of you who think Scotts guilty of murder, you people cant look beyond him cheating and you're influenced by the media. I fill sorry for the person on trial in a courtroom with you as a juror.

Shame on you, shame on the cops, the prosecutors and especially shame on the appeals court. Our justice system sure is screwed up.

My heart goes out to Scott, Lacy, Conner and their families.

Josh

9/5/2017 01:19:50 pm

You are absolutely right. Our justice system completely dropped the ball on every aspect of this case. He deserves a second chance at a trial and a truly fair jury!

Pepper

9/5/2017 07:20:01 am

I posted "especially shame on the appeals court" I'm sorry, I misread it and thought the appeals court denied Scotts appeal. I was wrong. So we are still crossing our fingers that he wins this.

Kathya

9/23/2017 08:26:24 am

I totally agree with you. This website is not a blog filled with statements by his family to persuade people to lean in favor of Scott...instead, the statements actually show proof of so many things that point to a not guilty verdict that Scott should have received at trial. I’m one of those people who just watched the news and drew my own conclusions but after researching this and leaning more facts, I now believe Scott was wrongfully convicted. I will pray for the Peterson family that Scott not only gets a new trial, but that his name is cleared and he can be done with this horrible nightmare.

Chris Nicholas

9/7/2017 05:44:59 pm

For years, I knew that whether guilty or innocent, Scott was convicted without evidence. No witnesses, confession, forensics. I've had debates with friends who swear by his guilt based on the mountain of evidence provided by the media. All of this circumstantial evidence was proven false at trial, but was not corrected by the media. Scott is not alone. The West Memphis 3, Norfolk 4, Central Park 5. All convicted with no evidence and media bias. It's time we as Americans stopped using the news to tell us who's guilty and expect our police and courts to do so. We cannot expect a jury to only rule on evidence presented when any juror's family, friends, or coworkers have been convinced by media. How does one free the devil and go back to work with Christians? Scott has an almost impossible battle ahead, but if I can help at all, please contact me. I believe it's time our police, media, and politicians begin upholding the constitution instead of money making television ratings and moral panics.

Jaroslaw

8/18/2018 06:21:12 pm

Chris Nicholas - I have read a huge number of comments by now and have not seen this. Canada for sure and likely UK and Australia since they have very similar legal systems - do not allow media coverage of trials. The USA should do the same.

christopher m silva

9/10/2017 09:23:00 am

Free Scott Peterson, free Scott Peterson, free Scott Peterson,

Amber Fry Scott

9/12/2017 05:40:39 am

All the comments that are good are from someone tied to the family because they make sure they say their wished to the family so we won't think it's them, lol. Um where was the family like 10 years ago? Where was the appeal then? Why speaking out now for Scott? 6 cement circles in the warehouse? He snaked her to the bottom of the ocean and she and Conner will haunt him forever no matter what.

Chris

9/13/2017 11:43:12 am

There were no cement blocks found! Not true. Lol

Sandy

12/21/2017 02:42:39 pm

I totally agree with Amber. The family is in denial. They need to move on and save there money and time. He is evil. Look at him now - he looks terrible. I still think he had something to do with the other missing girl too

Sandy

12/22/2017 05:19:18 am

Your appeal reasons are weak and poor and has nothing to do with an appeal. Explain telling amber lacy was lost before she was lost. explain why her body ended up as same place he was fishing. explain why he told people he did not want a baby and felt uncomfortable, explain his lack of concern. Save your appeal because you have nothing. explain why he sold her car and wanted to sell the house. What a coward and his excused as to why he did not show emotion and why he kept calling amber is nothing but bull. I pray for scotts family for them to own up to what has happened and scott to finally omit what he has done. I cannot wait until Scott is executed for everything he has done. I do not blame Lacy;s family for not wanting to communicate with scott's family. Regardless if he is related to you he took his wife's life and maybe has done it before. Remember during his interview he said she was imazing and changed it to she is amazing. What a dumb ass. How dare you all for keeping this murder alive. Scotts family is guilty for continnuing to baby this murderer. What a spoiled boy who is stupid. Cannot wait until he is executed and hope I can watch that on tv.

Randall

9/12/2017 03:30:52 pm

Followed the case for years. no evidence of guilt has ever been presented to anyone. T he news convicted him and they will have to answer for that , as Nancy Grace stated HE JUST RUBBED ME WRONG I guess that made him guilty. Sometimes the truth has a late arrival. I hope not in this case, he is not guilty.

Katelyn

9/12/2017 09:52:37 pm

I'm praying justice will be truly found and Scott is freed . This mans entire world came crashing down and his entire life has been taken . this whole family has suffered through some,of the toughest things I couldn't imagine I'm praying for Scott and his family . God please don't take this innocent man

Bil

9/12/2017 09:55:37 pm

After viewing the A&E documentary I can only say there was clearly reasonable doubt. I did not follow the case at its inception. Having served on juries myself including once as a foreman I can tell you that jurors regularly ingnore the judges instructions, usually do make up their minds prior to deliberations and regularly base their findings on emotion rather than actual evidence and do this all while claiming impartiality. The fact that Scott was an adulterer may speak to his immorality but is not conclusive evidence barring any proof that he conspired with Amber Frey to murder Laci Peterson. Clearly the judge erred in not allowing evidence regarding the burglary and sightings of Laci walking her dog. It is also clear that in doing so the judge prevented Scott from getting a fair trial. It is critical that people understand that although Scott Peterson may not be a nice guy this in no way justifies a conviction. Hate Scott if you will but the justice system was perverted in this case and the jury clearly reached the wrong verdict. The so called overwhelming evidence consisted mainly of innuendo, misinformation and bungling by the judge, jury, and defense lawyers. In addition I would posit that Scott should get a new trial based on Jury misconduct and that the judge should have declared a mistrial at the very least. The juror nicknamed "Strawberry Shortcake" should not have been seated as a juror due to her bias and clear presumption of guilt and refusal to refrain from making her decision on Scott's guilt or innocence prior to deliberations as evidenced by the A&E documentary. What happened to Laci & Conner was terrible however this does not suspend the jury from following the law nor does it permit people such as Nancy Grace and others in the media from propagating the presumption of Scott's guilt to his detriment. In short, there was not enough real evidence presented to sustain a conviction. There were no eye witness, no forensic evidence, no firm motive and Scott was clearly disadvantaged and convicted based on emotions, innuendo, lies, misinformation and judicial error. Observers should quake in their boots at the idea of having a legal system that allows a conviction with so little actual evidence. Even if Scott actually did the deed the prosecution clearly failed to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt and therefore on that basis alone he deserves a new trial. I do not know if Scott did it or not but when all the true facts are taken into consideration and al the evidence including that which the judge erroneously disallowed it is when viewed in a dispassionate logical way it is most certainly clear there was a preponderance of reasonable doubt. Those screaming for Justice for Laci seem to forget that if Scott is innocent then no justice was served as in that case the actual persons responsible for Laci and Conner's murder now walk freely amongst us. It is a travesty of justice to convict a person of a capital crime because one simply doesn't like the accused. We must, especially in capital cases err on the side of no convictions when they are presented with no concrete substantial evidence and we may not convict a defendant based on intangible things such as dislike of the accused, innuendo, gut feelings, or to simply vent and seek emotional relief. The jury was clearly manipulated and the substitution of jurors to obtain the desired results of a conviction by the prosecution must be disavowed. The jurors themselves as well as the judge failed the legal system and the accused in this case. If Scott Peterson committed these crimes let it be proved beyond a reasonable doubt rather than allowing his life to be taken by the state because jurors simply guessed he did it and didn't like him. On that basis alone he should get a new trial. Prove he did it or acquit him. Perverting the justice system to obtain his conviction was an immoral act. The prosecution had little more than a hunch he did it besides their personal dislike for him. Thinking he looks guilty, he cheated so he killed her, rubbing us "the wrong way" etc... is hardly grounds for conviction. Surely one could agree a person responsible for such heinous crimes should not escape punishment however we are not allowed to find Scott guilty simply because we believe someone must pay or because the political bureaucracy demands blood and an arrest and conviction without clear solid evidence. It is scary to think one could be convicted of a capital crime on that basis. Give Scott his new trail, to do otherwise is a mistake. If he dit it I reiterate, prove it! If he didn't then find the real killers.

Chris jackson

9/13/2017 11:42:04 am

People , one of the main problems I have always had with this case is there was no real proof he did it , and more importantly , why would he (Scott) admit to the exact place he had been fishing if he had just dumped the bodies there?! Think about that....makes no sense.

Pepper

9/14/2017 05:28:01 pm

Who the heck is this Amber Fry Scott? Is this someones sick humor?

So what you're saying is that everyone thinks that Scott Peterson is guilty except for his family and everyone on this blog is his family but is pretending to be someone else. Thinking like that deserves a big LOL!!!!

I remember Scott Peterson's family always sticking by him, now and as you say 10 years ago, but I say more like 15 years.

sandy

9/14/2017 07:40:11 pm

I am all for the death penalty in the case where guilt has been proven without a shadow of the doubt ( i.e charles manson) but in this case guilt has not been proven. Yes to a new trial however there is no where scott can get a fair trial. Yes he had an affair, he was scum of the earth but that in itself does not prove guilt of murder. And no not a relative or connected to california in any way. I am a 57 year old divorced female.6

Randall William Redlowsk

9/14/2017 08:37:59 pm

I was watch the channel 7 show and heard amber Fry's statement to the press that she was a single mother of 23 month old baby and it hit me and I am wondering why this has never hit anyone else the prosecutions whole motive for Scott killing Lacey was she got pregnant and Scott did not want the kid and was selfish and wanted to be a free man with amber well why would Scott kill his wife and his own baby only to get into a relationship with a woman with a kid in the terrible 2s which is not even his kid but another mans that makes no sense if the kid was the reason he killed his wife and baby THAT DESTROYS THE PROSECUTIONS MOTIVE! Why am I the only one who sees this why didn't his million dollor lawyer and investigators see this and destroy the prosecution why didn't anyone on the a and e show pick this up why didn't the jury pick this up Scotts relationship with amber proves the prosecutions motive is wrong who would kill their own kid for another mans baby plus Lacey was way prettier that amber anyway someone from the Peterson family or lawyer please comment on this so I know you seen it and I want to know what you think about what I said because you can't e-mail me cause my e-mail is not working for me. Thank you Ya I don't know if he did or didn't do it but from what I seen on TV he did not get a fair trial and should not have been convicted

John Lindsey

9/15/2017 12:08:47 pm

I just watched the documentaries last night. Not Guilty or Guilty this man never received a fair trial. There are so many holes in the States Case. Police evidence was bungled. No questions to witnesses who saw Laci in the neighborhood? No questions to the witness who saw and heard Laci talking to the crooks across the street? The day she went missing?
What really bothered me, was the jurors. Because of their impatience and bullying, Scott was actually railroaded. It was crucial to go over the evidence again for the new jurors. But the jurors did not stay true to the rule. Innocent until proven guilty. Some jurors had Scott guilty in the beginning. All circumstantial evidenced pieced together to make it seem like Scott was involved. The case should have been a mistrial. Utterly ridiculous. I would dye my hair and go far away with family too if I had this Monster of a trial engulfing me. What a nightmare. The police should do an internal investigation, they might find something. Need a new trial with all the evidence! With stable and competent jurors. That's All.

9/19/2017 07:24:43 pm

How delusional are you nut cases? Scott will burn in hell for what he's done and so will all of you supporting this soulless monster

Carol G.

9/19/2017 07:41:37 pm

To Brian, What if your child was beaten, tortured beyond belief, raped, stabbed, shot and finally murdered? You might then believe in the death penalty. You think? Read the Bible. An eye for an eye! If Scott Peterson was a decent man of any degree, he would put his family out of their misery by confessing. His family deserves the truth from him. There is NO doubt in my mind and in the minds of millions that he is guilty. Who else did the murders?

Daniel Ward

9/20/2017 10:38:24 am

When Scott was convicted I was not surprised due to the unrelenting media coverage that he was guilty. After finally learning the facts of the case from the A&E documentary, I feel this is one of the greatest miscarriage of justice that this country has ever seen. The judge, police, and prosecutors should be the ones in prison for dereliction of their duties. God help Scott Peterson. A cad not a killer.

Megan Carson

9/20/2017 11:42:35 am

I initially belived Scott to be guilty. However after seeing the documentary, I feel that he may very well be innocent. There were too many facts not brought to light during the original trial. I believe that I could not convict Scott now knowing facts that were withheld. I pray for the Peterson family. I hope Scott gets a second chance. The state can't prove his guilt. He may be a cheating womanizer, but that doesn't make him a killer.

Patti

9/20/2017 11:58:22 am

Maybe Scott was the one who hired those robbers across the street to kidnap and kill Lacy and her unborn child.

Patti

9/20/2017 12:03:26 pm

And maybe, just maybe the robbers brought the body to Scott where he was fishing and dumped Lacy & Conner. Hmmm

Ginny Hillen

9/20/2017 12:32:06 pm

Did anyone look into the burglars van. Maybe they killed her and her unborn child.

Chris p

9/21/2017 12:25:50 am

I have not really heard much about the autopsy of baby Conner. What kind of fluid was found in his lungs? If Laci had died then been put in the bay the baby's lungs would have amniotic fluid in them. If she had given birth then he was drowned he would have water in them or if he had died after she had given birth he would have had air in his lungs. Looking at the fluid in his lungs could also possibly give a timeline as to when they died.

Devon

9/21/2017 11:09:18 am

Laci did get justice....Scott is on death row awaiting execution. DUH!

Scott Edward

9/21/2017 07:04:28 pm

Some of those jury members should be on trial. Haven't seen any real evidence - just a bunch of people assuming what they want to believe based on a lot of exaggerated press. Maybe he did? Maybe he didn't, but no one has proved it without a shadow of doubt. He should have his case.

Angela R Lee link

9/23/2017 03:08:15 pm

I followed this case from the beginning. I believe that I have read all the books, both pro and con. Do I believe he recieved a fair trial?? Oh NO!! By no means!! He was found guilty long before his arrest and the jury "cough" was selected. I could NEVER put a man on death row with NO physical evidence! Was he a cad? Yes. He cheated, he lied, he was a hound dog....but did they prove murder. NO.

Steph

9/23/2017 07:52:23 pm

He deserves a new trial. The evidence that was not presented is overwhelmingly and the jury misconduct is appalling. RIP Laci and Conner

Phoenyx

9/24/2017 09:00:19 am

Why didn't the police analyze the ground where Scott dumped the mop bucket to find traces of DNA? If the burglary across the street happened on the 24th, why didn't Laci call 911 before confronting the burglars? Finally, somebody should be searching the bottom of the bay looking for the cement blocks they say he tied to her. Then if found compare them to the buckets he supposedly made them out of.

Regardless, he wasn't given a fair trial and should be released on that fact alone. How many cases get thrown out of court due to mishandling of evidence???

Sonia Robinson

9/28/2017 07:05:40 pm

I think it's a far leap from a cheater to a murder..what about the other pregnant women found just like Laci? I'm just not enough evidence for me to convict him of this crime. I wanted to believe Scott was guilty but If I had doubts I would have to be honest with the courts not with a mob mentality

Tiffany Christian

9/28/2017 08:23:42 pm

So sad...i watched the episode on a&r..broke my heart..evidence supports his innocence...he lost his wife n son, didn't do it and is on death row..our government is so ass backwards....my heart hurts for Scott peterson....even when he's released he will never be able to have a normal life...people in this day need to blame someone...cant trust a coo to save ur life. So sad....i believe in u Scott Peterson

Reasonal Doubt

9/28/2017 09:14:42 pm

I just watched the special. I was in total belief that Scott Peterson was guilty and deserved prison. However, there is a lot of evidence that shows the contrary. The problem is, which his family and advocates never discuss is his actions. The mistress, the lying, no display of grieving, not taking a polygraph if he is innocent, being at the same exact place where Laci was found. The family which stands by him never apologize for his immoral actions, they just try to prove his innocence. The most insulting action was putting flowers where Connor was found, but no mention of Laci or paying tribute to her. Its almost as if they blame her for her death. Which to me, displays the same actions that Scott did. Maybe he didn't do it, therefore he doesn't deserve to be in prison much less death row. At the end of the day it was about who he was as a man and husband. Clearly those actions are not a legal crime, it is a moral crime and that is not illegal. I have always felt justice has been served, but what if he did not murder Laci and Connor? Or the other option, which is more disgusting that I am buying what they are selling.

Nicole

9/29/2017 10:23:11 am

I heard about this case when it was initially going on but since I have no ties to the family or anyone involved I never really paid much attention to it. But as I watch it all on A&E, I believe that there was not enough proof to say that he was guilty. I do not believe that he was given a fair trial and everyone in my opinion had voted guilty because that's what the outsiders wanted to be seen done and they were probably scared if they voted innocent that they would be persecuted as well. I live on the east coast end again I have no ties to anyone and I've never met or talked to any of these people at all that's involved in this case I'm just putting my personal opinion out there on what I'm seeing. I personally vote innocent because there was not enough evidence to prove otherwise. And it is such a sad day indeed when the jury and the people in general just automatically assumed guilty because that's what the media and the Press is putting out there. I would like to see Scott go free but at the same time I would be very scared for him because you know the world no matter what him or any of us say automatically seen as guilty and there will always be somebody out there trying to harm him for the rest of his life I really truly do feel for him and his family that has to be put through all this I could not imagine how hard it is. No matter what anybody says any negative thing against me or anyone else I continue to stand by my verdict of Innocence.

Karen Bedwell

9/30/2017 07:51:13 pm

I was a teenager when i heard about this all over the news in iowa. My mom said through the whole thing he was innocent but due to all the publicity he will never get a fair trial. I was horrified that he cheated on his pregnant wife but a cheater isnt a murderer. I get that now. After watching the documentary on tv (the second time this week) i truly think he did not kill his wife and baby. And although the tragedy of conor is no less a tragedy by law shouldnt they have had to prove that conor ever took a breath or had a beating heart outside of laci to be trialed as a double homicide. I pray for everyone involved and really believe the killer is still out there bug dont believe it is scott.

Becky Brundige

9/30/2017 07:51:19 pm

I was aware of the case at the time of his conviction. I always thought he was wrongfully convicted. Yes he was a liar and cheat but that doesn't equal murder. I started to think he didn't get a fair trial when the jury started acting up. I'd like to see him get a fair trial with all witnesses with a jury that isn't prejudiced.

Karen Bedwell

9/30/2017 07:57:41 pm

Wonder what was going on in the government that media was destracting us from with this case to divert our attention and cause an innocent man to be guilty. Casey anthony walked free after chloroform and her own mother said it smelled like a dead body in her car. I think she truly killed her baby with much evidence of her guilt. She walked but he gets death with no incriminating evidence. Messed up

Ann

9/30/2017 08:42:28 pm

Mark Geragos is my attorney after hearing all the facts I truly believe Scott had nothing to do with that too many people saw her no one investigated the crime with the burglary across the street I think Scott is innocent and I hope the family can prevail going

Cassie

10/1/2017 05:02:56 pm

I was only around 14 while Scott's trial was happening but I remember thinking he must be guilty because of how the media portrayed him. But after watching the documentary on Lifetime recently it's clear that much evidence was omitted during the trial. I am outraged by this verdict and now believe Scott is innocent. My thoughts are with him and his family in light of this appeal!

Jeannie

10/2/2017 09:39:00 am

I strongly believe Scott is innocent and is spending all these years in prison and on death row wrongfully, I truly hope that the truth comes out and he is set free to live whatever life he has left.

John Dunaber

10/3/2017 05:44:52 pm

I was just listening to the Amber tapes. I'm telling you, those never get old. It is so funny to hear Scott tell lie after lie after lie. Do you know what he had the gall to tell Amber? He said, "Amber, I never cheated on you". Even Amber asked how is that possible when you were married to Laci? He lies even when it is plainly obvious that he is lying. It makes me wonder, is the whole Peterson family like this? To say that he never cheated on Amber like he is some fine upstanding person, when he was cheating on Laci and Amber, what a scumbag.

marla potter

10/5/2017 10:43:41 pm

I think it is amazing that Scott's family says it would have been virtually impossible for Scott to dump the body in the bay, but they have no problem believing that someone else went to extraordinary risk to drive the body 90 miles and dump it in the bay, while the police were in the process of searching the bay, just to frame Scott. Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds? There is just no way anyone would do that. The risk of getting caught was just too great. They could have dumped the body anywhere out of sight and still gotten away with it. They didn't need to go to that risk. Scott had to. He didn't want the body found. He wanted her to permanently disappear.

Jaroslaw

8/18/2018 07:05:49 pm

Maria - it was impossible for Scott to dump a 150 lb body off a John boat. Reenactments prove the boat would have capsized. The bodies didn't wash ashore for 4 months. That the police never looked for and/or other suspects by itself hardly prove Scott did it.

Tara

10/8/2017 11:58:17 am

I haven't always been convinced of Scott's innocence. I was full of hate and venom and followed the mob mentality. I believed everything I heard on tv, read in papers etc. The media is full of crap people and if this last election hasn't taught you anything else, it should be THAT !!! Fast forward to today, I've watched the A & E series with an open mind and WOW !!! There was more than reasonable doubt...then add to it information from his website, other forums that believe in his innocence and now I KNOW he isn't guilty. If everyone could please just have an open mind...that is seriously all it takes....if you watch nothing else, the last episode of the A & E series will change your heart and mind !!! Trust me !! I started where you are now.....you habe nothing to lose from educating yourself. Scott on the other hand who has lost so much already , still stands to lose his life if we don't get things corrected!

Dana Turner

10/9/2017 07:52:21 am

Wow there are so many judgemental people making comments on here who have obviously not seen all the new evidence. I was once one of those pieces of shit on that same broken band wagon until I saw the new documentary. I am so glad the family has continued this fight. People need to remember everyone grieves differently and no one knows how they would react under that sort of stress. Only God and Scott truly know. I am praying for the Peterson family.

Marcus

10/10/2017 04:39:04 pm

I have just been watching this ew programme on Crime & Investigation in London UK. I have to say I am a psychotherapist and work with murderers in the UK. Sadly although there are flaws in this case it's is quite evident that Scott is guilty of murder. Several reasons. Body language, eyes, language, behaviour. By this I mean who on earth would want to play golf with their dad after they had found the body's of his wife and child. He even says himself "it won't look good if I'm playing golf" his lack of genuine tears, is major alarm bells. As a fresh pair of eyes on this case who has seen nothing about it prior to tonight then his motive was simple, he told Amber he was single, no kids, not married. He wanted to be free again and be single. He lied to the WORLD that he had told the police about his affair. If anyone of us was genuinely innocent we simply would not lie about ANYTHING!! This was the ultimate wrong doing so for a man to continue to lie is very paychopathic. By just these very small but significant observations it is clear that Scott is guilty. Also $250,000 is a large reward for anyone to come forward. No one has! I do not advocate the death penalty I think it is no different from someone who has committed murder the person who gives that injection is to me also a murderer.

After seeing Scott and hearing him and reading things on this website I am 99.9% sure Scott will never admit to this murder. He holds on to the hope that his lies will set him free, his lawyers and his family believe him so why won't the world. That is his only way out if he manipulated his family and lawyers to devote their lives to setting him free. Until there is no hope he will convince himself he is Innocent.

I feel the family are in denial and have devoted their lives to proving lies are the truth. Sadly this also is a life sentence for the family. I'm confdent with enough time I would get a confession from Scott. After working with many many offenders I'm yet to be defeated in doing so.

Let's be blunt here. Only 2 people know what actually happened. we may never know the truth. As a therapist I find that very sad for all parties. I only hope all parties can find some peace. Sad story but what is more sad that is the loss of so many lives.

Jaroslaw

8/18/2018 07:26:59 pm

Marcus - I have known people who were not emotional. One dear friend who did everything for her mother sat at the funeral and never shed a tear. Her sisters who did nothing put on the histrionics and had to be "carried" out only to drag themselves back into the sanctuary to continue performing. And I have read several accounts where Laci's FATHER said Scott was out golfing.NOT Scott. The many documentaries and articles have found much media misinformation. This is not just his family saying this. Your credentials do not prove you are objectively looking at the facts.

E:D.

10/20/2017 09:23:28 pm

Will he take a polygraph whose results would be made public?
Why didn't he testify at his trial? An innocent person would be chomping at the bit to tell his side,

Tammy

10/25/2017 05:42:38 pm

I don't think Scott had anything to do with Laci or Connor killings praying for you Scott

jesse387

11/5/2017 06:17:07 pm

This DOG, less than human is a murderer. he did it. Who else had a motive to kill that sweet girl. NO ONE. I get it its hard to want to believe their family member is PURE evil. BUT he is. He's a liar. Listen to the tapes to amber. If their bodies didn't wash up in the bay. he MIGHT have a prayer, but from the grave Laci spoke, and she said loud and clear. MY husband killed me. Connor said, My daddy killed me.

Xanthi L Shumake

11/14/2017 07:21:57 am

I am sorry for the families on both sides. But, when he was recorded admitting he told Amber he lost his wife on the 9th of December and she went missing 24th. Why hasn't anyone talked about that? I'm sorry, he's guilty.

Ele

11/18/2017 02:36:33 pm

He has not proven innocence but neither guilt. I don't think he got a fair trial and is very disturbing that a person can either get the death penalty or life in prison on circunstancial "evidence".

Christy

11/18/2017 10:32:38 pm

I thought this man was guilty in the beginning. Simply because of what the media led us to believe. But I watched the show with his dad and sisters and family......therefore it led me to believe he has been wrongly convicted and he deserves the right to not only another trial but to also have the people that publicly humiliated him......appologize. scott....been praying....will keep praying.....not only for you....but for everyone in your family. God bless you all and just know prayer does help. I'm on your guys side. And I will be writing him soon. Hope he takes and reads my letter.

Christy link

11/18/2017 10:50:41 pm

firmly believe scott is innocent. Everyone has an opinion. And it has made me mad w some of these comments against him. I have 2 children. My husband is 15 yrs older than me. Been with him for 5 yrs. They are young and lost their real dad a while back. I met him when I was 13.to lose A parent....from my kids point of view is the worst thing to ever happen. For a man to lose his wife an unborn child is unimaginable. For scott never had the chance to know what it felt to feel his love for his child. Or to feel what it's like to receive that love in return. God bless his family and "friends". Which I am afraid he has no friends other than "fans". You all have my sympathy and prayers and I hope scott gets what he deseeves. Whether that be freedom in this messed up world or freedom in mine and hopefully hid faith in our Lord and savior.

Susan McDaniel

11/19/2017 12:20:03 am

From everything I heard during the trial and now all these years later...
I could not find Scott guilty. I've never thought he was guilty. He was kind of an asshole to Lacie and Amber though. That doesn't equal murder. I've known lots of guys like Scott, none were murderers!
Damn! I hope I never get caught up in something like that and then am found guilty of something I didnt do!!!

Helen

12/17/2017 10:29:28 pm

LOL

Susan McDaniel

11/23/2017 02:44:32 am

Notify me of new comments

Joe Smith

11/28/2017 07:46:29 am

Scott is absolutely guilty. I watched the whole thing from bargaining to end and he did nothing but lie. Im not even interested in what he has to say now because only trying to save himself. He would say anything at this point so why should anyone believe him now.

Julie

11/28/2017 08:04:11 am

If you review ALL of the evidence, not just the excerpts from the media and MPD like many people do, he is innocent. Being guilty of adultery and watching porn does not make one a murderer. I am hoping and praying that his appeal is granted soon and he can finally be exonerated after sitting on death row for a crime he did not commit. I could only imagine the nightmare Scott has been through and lives in everyday. I feel so bad for him and am praying for him and his wellbeing.

Marisa Blanck

12/1/2017 12:38:19 pm

I was wondering why a marine specialist or oceanographer never testified on behalf of the defense. Even if Laci was weighted down and sea life got to her legs, releasing the weights, I believe the bottom currents would have carried her much further than that close to where Scott was fishing after all that time. I live in south FL and when things like this happen here, even after just DAYS, the coast guard looks all up and down the coastline. If it happens in the inlet or the river, the searches are EVERYWHERE. I realize they searched the whole bay in the beginning and didn't find her, but I still think a person from ROLF'S should be brought in or something.

Christina

12/1/2017 11:16:30 pm

Nobody believes this bs!

John Hagen

12/18/2017 03:32:02 pm

I don't believe Scott murdered Lacy. The facts don't stack up.
Maybe I missed something, but why was Lacy mopping floor when housekeeper was there the day before?

Shelly

12/19/2017 05:04:38 pm

He’s a narcissistic, sociopath who wanted to get rid of his wife (and child) who were in the way of his trysts. He has no emotion, sympathy or empathy for anyone. He and his SIL have you all baited, hook, line and sinker.

Rebecca

12/21/2017 12:43:18 am

Guilty or not guilty shouldn’t be the main concern. The fact that this man was sentenced to death on nothing more than a botched investigation with circumstantial evidence should be the real concern here to anyone!! Terrifying really. The police never investigated Laci’s disappearance. They focused all of their time and effort on investigating Scott’s guilt.
Furthermore, there is way too much reasonable doubt in this case for any guilty conviction other than Scott being guilty of cheating on his wife! And if someone else did murder Laci and her unborn son, they would certainly have the perfect place to dump them wouldn’t they? The police announced Scott’s alibi and its location (the Berkeley marina) BEFORE the bodies were found so there is a possibility someone else could have murdered Laci and Connor and placed them there after Scott’s alibi and location were disclosed to the public.
Regardless of what you think of him for cheating on his pregnant wife and being an all around schmuck, he still has the right to a fair trial and Laci deserved a proper investigation. Unfortunately, we will never know the truth of what happened to Laci and Connor and I am left to wonder if an innocent man is sitting on death row.

Stephen Lucas

12/21/2017 11:10:12 am

This trial was a travesty of Justice. The Media dictated this trial from the beginning& the Police needed a scapegoat. Many leads in the case were never followed up on & there is definitely no Smoking Gun. Nancy Grace ( Loser) had Scott convicted before the Trial ever started. It’s a shame that in this great country of ours a person can be sentenced to death by the Media ( Fake News) I pray someday that Laci & Conner’s true murderer is found & that the evidence proves it.

Joslyn Warburton

12/27/2017 04:05:47 pm

I have from day one of hearing about the muder case against Scott believed with all my heart & soul that he is innocent. Still to this very day despite all the things I've seen & heard from the media over the years about the case. I've yet to see or hear a single scrap of evidence that could convince me Scott is anything but INNOCENT!! How can a jury convict a man to death without a single piece of evidence Scott was convicted on just words alone. That's bullshit words can very easily be all lies but physical evidence can't lie.I believe the jury had already made there minds up from day one so no matter the fact there's no evidence just words,lies & coverups to them he was guilty no matter what. Scott be strong don't give up keep fighting there lies will be exposed for what they are the truth will always win over evil. Scott much love & best wishes to you from Joslyn xox

Tenille

12/28/2017 07:44:09 pm

It amazes me that in our country these days, even 15 years ago that the concept of innocent until proven guilty is no longer........yes yes I know he was found guilty, however, I think he was "found guilty" before the trial even began.......the other thing that amazes me is the concept of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt..........um hello!!!!! there is so much doubt in this case and the jurors were idiots!!!! prejudice as all get out!!! And if you don't think that you should go back and see some of the interviews with them after the trial.........i believe he is innocent!!!! BECAUSE THERE IS NO PROOF THAT HE DID IT!!! What is going on with the legal system these days??? They got it wrong on this one and the Modesto police were determined to make him the murderer..........such a shame.......i hope justice prevails in this case as well........unfortunately my faith in the system is not very strong, I hope there is a judge involved that will see the "doubt" all in this case, but know this, if it doesn't happen here on earth, it will happen in the afterlife.........we don't always get the justice we deserve in our lifetime, however, our maker will be the ultimate judge, but I really do hope in this case it will prevail and his conviction is overturned......prayers for the peterson family and Laci and Conner's actual killer is revealed

Ted from Australia

1/11/2018 05:08:50 pm

I hope the Habeas appeal is granted. There needs to be new and vigorous investigation of the burglary at the house opposite the Peterson residence. If Laci came home and confronted the men with the van she was putting herself in danger. If the person who saw a woman with the men apparently urinating, then maybe in the stress of the moment of confronting them Laci's waters broke. The men panicked at this - and perhaps decided to take her with them (or take her to hospital?), knowing that any death that occurs in the commission of a felony will lead to murder charges for them all they would try to hide her. When they heard about the Scott Perterson 'alibi' they knew they could kill her and where they could hide the body so that suspicion would fall on another.

NorCal Momma

1/22/2018 01:20:30 pm

I was young when this all took place. At the time, I bought into all the media. I just knew he did it because he was a cheater and cheaters are bad.

Now, looking back, and growing up, I have a new opinion. There's always 3 sides to a story - his, hers and the truth. We may never know what happened but from everything I've read (court docs, not media) I strongly disagree with the jury's decision. They, like me, got caught up in the Amber fiasco. There was nothing proven without a reasonable doubt that tied him to this crime and what little circumstantial evidence was there, wasn't accurate.

All the publicity surrounding this investigation made it so easy for the killer to take Mrs. Peterson and her unborn baby to the bay where he had already admitted he had been fishing - it's really convenient.

I feel like the only way Scott would get a fair trial is by waving the jury, and even that is risky.

Good luck!

Susan

1/29/2018 09:15:17 am

The question that everything turned on was, if Scott was not involved, how exactly did the bodies of Laci and Conner end up right there in the Bay where Scott was fishing that day?

Some burglar killed her? Some homeless guy? OK, so this homeless burglar had a boat and a truck (really?? he did? Why would he have that?), he loaded up the body and took it many miles to the bay and dumped it? Why or how would he do that?

What happened is that Scott killed Laci (and so, also Conner), loaded the body in the boat, went "fishing" and dumped it, weighted, into the Bay. If his luck or the chains or whatever had held, no one would ever have known, and he'd be a free man today.

But the ropes broke and the bodies floated to the surface and were found. Rotten luck for a sociopath. But things to catch up with people. I'm wondering why he killed her, but people like that, they don't need a reason. Maybe he just got tired of having responsibilities. Once that baby was born he'd be stuck with child support for 18 years.

Karen j. Nyman

2/2/2018 11:15:33 am

This case makes me so angry!!! How can you sentence a man to die on circumstantial evidence?? And because people assumed the poor man should have acted or responded in such manor they saw fit!!! He lost his wife and unborn child so take his life and sentence him to die??? Bullshit!!! Nancy Grace and her guilty from day one b.s., like your husband never had a mistress in your marrige??? All makes me angry, if there was anything I could personally do to help set him free I would, because what they did to him, was like o.j. Simpson trial and no not cause he was guilty, cause it was a mplete mockery of everything our judicial system stands for!!!!

Chittery

2/21/2018 07:44:59 pm

Seriously, you are delusional. Scott killed her. He bleached the house, dumped Laci's body and is disassociative enough to deny it all. Special place in hell for him.

Caroline Perry link

3/1/2018 07:28:34 pm

I don’t know any of the pertinent characters in this story. But I did go to medical school. I did got to law school. I wasn’t there. I am not a witness. However, I have done extensive research and my conclusion is the following: I don’t know if he is innocent or guilty, but I am 100% certain that he did not get a fair trial. Every US citizen is entitled to such and even though multiple items have be exposed to support such a contention. People still just want to believe he is guilty. Put your Place in his shoes. You don’t know. You can’t be certain. No one saw Laci and Connor parish. But we know what the police, prosecutors, media, and jury did and that adds up to an unfair trial. He deserves a new trial and I would be more than happy to help in any way possible.

Jen

3/30/2018 10:03:09 pm

Rot in hell, Scott !

Kat Baxter

4/26/2018 06:06:10 pm

When Lacy disappeared, I was going into my first year of law school. I had no idea of evidentiary concerns at trial. I was convinced Scott was guilty. Years later, I see the project about Laci's murder in six episodes, and I have no doubt that guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The behavior of jurors, prosecutors, police....in hind sight and looking at the case again...their behavior was at least as disturbing as Scott's behavior was alleged to be.
Real life courtroom drama probably took hold with the public in the OJ case. The public are not lawyers. The public may eventually be jurors at some point. However, the public back then was reminiscent of a lynch mob who wanted to be on tv...in this new forum of live legal media. Members of the public with no legal education involved themselves in the frenzy of belonging to the attention of the cause.
I was not surprised at the verdict, but the behavior of the jurors shocked me even then. Even then, I believed that the death penalty should not have been part of the sentence because the evidence didn't rise to the level. The evidence seen by the jury barely rose to the level to convict. In my mind now, I think the media and the jury were out for blood. The judicial system was tainted by media and how being around media in a frenzy impacts the uneducated views of the population around the scene.
I don't believe this was a premeditated murder. Narcissists are stupid. they habitually lie. Amber Frey was not a motive for murder. She had a child. If the prosecution's theory that he killed Laci to be with Amber were correct, they can't make sense of Scott killing a woman due to not wanting a child so he could be with a woman who has a child. It makes no sense. I don't believe Amber was the first mistress.
I had a feeling the boat was purchased to give Scott an alibi to cheat on his wife, not to kill her. It doesn't surprise me that Scott told Amber he was a widower. It sounds better to a narcissist than saying they are divorced or never married. Because they lie as a habit and try to be perceived as they want to be perceived....the rest of us don't understand the reason behind the lie. I think the boat was purchased to give Scott something to tell his wife he was going to do as he cheated on her. The boat does not say premeditation to me and neither does the lie to the latest mistress.
I think Scott got the receipt from the Marina to show it to his wife. It takes a while to get there, to fish, and return. My instinct is that he was grooming an alibi for future cheating and that he fully intended to me married to his wife and cheat via fishing.
I think he was grooming a double life. People call Scott a narcissist...most narcissists are socially inept and not going to do anything that draws focus to them in a negative way. He would have gotten more positive attention by having a wife and baby. He could have had his family and also his other life. He was successful that way.
I am almost convinced that this man was engaged in unsavory but non-violent ideation. I think he wanted his wife to accept his new hobby of fishing and boating so he could cheat on her using a hobby as an excuse. If Scott is a narcissist, he wouldn't harm the facade he built with his wife that pleased his family. He was already good at having a separate life no one knew about.
No doubt that Scott didn't have normal emotion for his wife. Many men really don't have those in the way the rest of us understand. Some people just find a grounding stone...a foundation that makes them stable. Narcissists work to keep someone like Laci.
There is no doubt in my mind that Laci was like a mother to Scott and no doubt that Laci knew he wasn't normal.
I don't believe there was enough evidence to convict, even though I don't like Scott. Karma is a bitch.
I have begun to doubt this man is guilty of murder. It makes sense to me after dealing with many minds in the practice of law that so many Scott Petersons are out there who can't perform an honest and right-minded life and can never appear correctly to the right-minded population. Not many of them have to figure out how to be acceptable if their wife comes up missing. Generally with narcissists, they can't handle unexpected things.
Laci probably was her husband's leader when he was called into question....when she was gone, I bet he didn't know how to deal with the scrutiny without her.
One thing the general public fails to understand in a media frenzy or even on an uneventful day is general psychology or law.

Grace Pferschy

5/8/2018 11:37:35 pm

Commit the CRIME ...PAY THE TIME X’s 2 !!
GUILTY as charged!!
Stop wasting taxpayers money on murdrrers!
MAN up & have some remorse MURDERER!!

Kate

7/16/2018 01:00:04 am

I followed the trial and heard the media screaming from almost day one that Scott was guilty because he didn't show enough emotion. I've seen defendants in other cases show emotion and the media accuses them of acting. There's no chance of winning against a biased media in any case. It reminds me of how Darlie Routier was convicted because of a video with silly string yet they omitted the beginning of the video that showed a lengthy prayer service at her sons' gravesite.

There were 6 people who told the MPD they saw Laci walking McKenzie, their dog, at the park or pass by their homes AFTER the time Scott had left his home. This was proven by his emails sent from the warehouse. However, the MPD ignored all 6 people who had the same timeline. Instead, they'd have you believe Scott killed Laci, loaded her body in his truck and took her to the warehouse to pick up his boat but stopped to send a few emails with her body still in the truck bed. He supposedly unloaded the body into the bay in broad daylight from a very shallow boat in rough waters w/o capsizing it. The only way it would have happened like this is if Scott killed Laci in a fit of rage. If that had happened, there would be no way he could have hidden DNA that certainly would have been found. However, there was zero physical evidence of any kind of altercation at the house, which means he would have had to have planned it. Scott Peterson is an SOB for cheating on his pregnant wife but he's not stupid. He would never have planned to kill her and then get rid of her body in broad daylight. We have proof she was at home until at least 9:30 according to her online activities. The only thing that makes sense is that she was walking McKenzie as Scott said and came across the burglary in progress and being the outspoken person she was known to be, confronted them. The recording of one of the burglars talking to his brother on the line from prison has him saying, "Don't talk about Laci Peterson, we're being recorded!" when his brother mentions the case to him. However, the MPD happens to have "lost" the tape of the phone call...how convenient. They set their sights on Scott from day one and never bothered to investigate anyone else. Facts matter! Scott Peterson never received a fair trial and moving it 80 miles away to an area that viewed the same media as Modesto did nothing to improve his chances. It should have been held in L.A. where they had a larger jury pool. There was also the juror that lied when questioned about prior bias who had been attacked when pregnant and the two jurors who were released by DeLucchi under questionable circumstances. All of this leads to a new trial, at the very least, for Scott Peterson. I can only hope and pray that we hear something positive soon from the Appellate Courts.

Andrea

8/1/2018 11:05:07 pm

I read on here that Scott did not tell Ron Grantski that he went golfing and that Ron just assumed it. BUT, I read on another website and The Fox show, interview with a monster, that he actually did tell his neighbor that he was golfing after she asked where have you been, it’s Xmas eve.

The next thing I want to bring up is the size of Conner and how you believe it proves his innocence. I guess the autopsy states that Conner was bigger than the 33 weeks. I have been an ob/gyn nurse for 15 years. Do you know how many babies measure bigger or smaller than the gestational age??? It’s like taking your child to the doctor and seeing what percentile they are in. All people grow at different rates, including fetuses. To say that all fetuses weigh the exact same and have the exact height or bone lengths, at a certain gestational age is preposterous!! It simply just isn’t true.

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

2015 News

Leave a Reply.

Archives

Categories

2015 News﻿

Leave a Reply.

Archives

Categories

2015 News